In Defense of Amy Winehouse
Neo-soul singer Amy Winehouse just played at the Vic in Chicago last night and the local critics were eager to voice their disappointment. Time Out Chicago's blog pointed out the shame "that Winehouse’s raw talent – so ably displayed on her recent Back To Black album – didn’t translate to a live setting." And Chicagoist pulled no punches: "From a critical standpoint, she was just a train wreck."
Ouch.
Chicagoist's Tankboy mentions that her SXSW performance "produced the buzz she rode into her sold-out Chicago show." Well, I didn't hear any of that buzz, so I came in with lower expectations. I love BtB, I've seen the music videos and read the booze and drug-streaked stories about her on gossip blogs. More importantly, I also checked out some performance videos on YouTube where she basically stood at a mic and sang in a dark, small space to subdued crowds. So as I walked into the early twentieth-century vaudeville theater, I wondered, "what will she actually do on a full stage?"
First, her 9-piece band, The Dap Kings, filed onto stage. Then Amy struts on to rapturous applause and good Lord she is tiny. Seriously, she's like a foot shorter than everyone else. (I don't just mean on stage. She's basically a foot shorter than anyone, ever) Her huge, upswept black hair and thick Cleopatra eye shadow probably weigh more than she does. She was wearing a belly-baring (and, thusly, tattoo-bearing) t-shirt and the lowest slung jeans I have ever seen. My first thought was, "is she going to sing out of her vagina?" I mean, I know she's talented...
Anyway. I, for one, was riveted by her. She carried a basket full of candy and popped in two huge pieces of bubblegum, and then sang flawlessly anyway. Between songs, after admitting in her thick British accent that she's terrible with onstage banter, she starts throwing candy into the crowd. Chicagoist referred to this as "padding" her set. Since when is talking to the crowd and having fun "padding"? Her remarks, when understandable, were hilarious. She danced in her own little funny way and made sure the stagehands kept her plastic cup full of gin. I like her.
There were nuances that maybe not every audience member could see depending on their angle. Chicagoist criticized her " annoying tendency to try and pull off the 'bad girl' act to mask insecurity and inexperience." She seemed genuinely surprised at the crowd's roaring enthusiasm, eliciting a smirk or widened eyes from her and looking back at her band as if to say, "can you believe this?" I swear we were witnessing this very young - and yes, maybe insecure - woman realizing the power she wields. She seemed to flit from unsure to torchy diva to brassy badass back to shy again within minutes. She is only 23 after all. (And then, to be honest, sometimes she seemed to be coasting on her big, bluesy voice alone.) It was raw, unpolished, uneven and totally refreshing to watch.
Did the show have problems? Sure. The set was short, but if you were smart enough to snag the tickets when they were $20 you might not be as pissed about that. The Dap Kings were underutilized. And, for some reason, they did rush the songs, but it seems inaccurate to criticize Amy for rushing her delivery - the songs were simply played faster so she accomodated appropriately.
Did she nervously fuss with her hair? Not that much, but even if she did, c'mon! Where do you think she keeps her extra booze? And yes she hiked up her jeans a lot, but no one criticizes rappers for touching their crotches for no reason a bazillion times per show. When Amy does it, it's a sign of her lack of presence.
On the contrary, it's exactly all these little tics and flaws that made her so interesting. She's not a one-note, run-up-and-down-the-stage performer, nor should she try to be. She's not a rock star. BtB is polished, but that doesn't mean we have to expect her performances to be. Many of her songs are about her fucking up, she referred to herself as "fuck up" on stage, and she's even documented her refusal to clean up her fucked-up-ness on her hit "Rehab." We all knew exactly what we were getting when going to her show. You can call her a "train wreck," but why stop there? She was a boozy, messy, funny, flirty, great-sounding train wreck. And it was bewitching.
Also check out: Soul Sisters: Amy Winehouse and Joss Stone.
And: Out with the Old, In with the Slightly Less Old.
9 comments:
Excellent post!My thoughts exactly when i read those other articles.Thank you for expressing them so eloquently.
A great write-up Donny. (Can I still call you that?) I saw Amy a few years back when she was promoting her first album here in the UK. Granted, she's more 'fucked-up' now, success early on does that to some young performers (Joss Stone) doesn't it? But I think her music's better for it. Back to Black is a much richer album than is Frank. It seems all the best artists produce their best work when they're a mess. It's a shame for them and a blessing for us. Would Billie Holliday be as lauded today had she been a bible-bashing, tea-totaller? Nah! Pass the gin!
Thanks, Anon!
Sandy, is Joss Stone fucked up? I didn't know that, but her newest album is her best so far.
Yeah, I've heard some of Frank and I'm underwhelmed. And I think you're right, unfortunately, about some artists needing the drama and fucked-up-ness to produce good stuff. Some artists, I think, just really buy into that whole "suffering artist" thing and don't want to let it go.
Hey it's me again,the anonymous who left the first comment..my name is Rebecca.I came back to re-read your post and make a somewhat "humiliating" confession...ready..ok,by the end of your post i was in tears.(just two or three of them,i wasn t like crying:)i know it seems stupid and the only reason i am "revealing"this to you is that i figured it must be nice to know that you can create that kind of emotion to a total stranger.I don't know if you are a writer by profession and i know you didn't write the post with the intention to make someone "teary" but...i guess what i am trying to say is that either i am mentally instable:) either you should write articles professionally (or it could be both!!:)Anyways thank you and good luck with whatever it is you re doing.
Wow, Rebecca, thank you for telling me that. I'm not sure what exactly would provoke you to tears but I'm glad my writing made such an impact. I'm not a professional writer but I hope to be soon. So maybe it's both my writing and you're mental instability? Ha ha.
And Sandy, yes, you can still call me Donny. :)
I am really happy to finally read a positive review! The girl is a phenomenal singer. I loved her performance because she was just so chill and playfull not so stiff and serious. I took it as a sign that she was comfortable being herself. I wonder if anyone else noticed that her future husband Blake was in the audience, she even stuck her toungue out at him playfully. I was arm's length from him on the right facing the stage in the front. It has got to be hard singing about the past pain they had together.
Anon, I had no idea he was there, nor do I really know anything about their relationship (besides what's in songs, but are they all about him?).
I agree...she had her moments of playful and relaxed, which was nice. She didn't force it, at least, not all the time.
I just adore her. And you know why? I think it IS because she is 23 and is covering her insecurities(um, hello, I know what that feels like) with her music...like, what music does...and it makes sense. She's just amazing. I didn't have the opportunity to see her live, but have seen some of her youtube performances and have always just sank in my chair and had goosebumps--why are critics so harsh to people who are trying to figure themselves our through their music? Why does everything have to be so polished? So practiced? So perfect?
Byron, I agree completely. That's what was so fascinating. I mean, it's not like they're selling her as someone who's got their shit together. I don't know why you'd expect someone so polished in the first place.
Post a Comment